, attached to 2013-10-31

Review by TheBlimpalot

TheBlimpalot @JOgden

I knew someone would play the irony card on my post. Congratulations on being the first to point out the obvious.

but I didn't say that every comment has to be superty-duper--
I did say that if the only way one can appreciate a phish show is by getting one's every wish fulfilled and every expectation met--which is what many pantywastes are saying: Oh--I didn't enjoy the show because it wasn't what I wanted and they should've done things my way.

The whole reason I got into phish was because they did things their way. They played what they wanted, how they wanted, when they wanted--and that's just fine by me. I may not get exactly what I want when I want it, but I certainly appreciate what I get and I get what I need. Phish always delivers--if one is gracious enough to accept it. Boymangodsh*t do they deliver.

Defend the whiners if you must--I just am tired of reading about how phish failed because self-ordained critics who hold unrealistic and ridiculous expectations poopoo about it when they're let down.

Phish debuted a bunch of new material and some pholks are complaining that they were there? That it wasn't a cover album? Really? punks


Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.

This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.

Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal

© 1990-2019  The Mockingbird Foundation, Inc. | Hosted by End Point Corporation