I think the stink is that the writer started off with an almost stated contrarian mission.

Beyond that, it’s wtf else do you want out of a Phish show? Bust outs, big jams, huge peaks, risk taking, great energy, long encore, etc... as the one comments said “this just proves that Phishheads will never be happy”.

Honestly, if you took out his mission statement of being contrary and dinky complaints (“there were a few missed notes” and “Makisupa was awkwardly placed”), you would think it was a glowing review of a badass show. In other words, he’s reviewing the show in comparison with everyone else’s review and other shows, right off the bat. Which is naturally going to invite more of the same in the responses.