This remnant will be replaced soon. The FAQ is back, with a new design!
How
are Phish different from the Dead?
The Grateful Dead did not pioneer group improvisation
(jazz did), fan taping and trading of performances
(bluegrass did), drug use, or other things
that happen to be common to both groups.
The Dead were a rock band that started before rock and roll now
known. Phish, by contrast, are a rock band first and foremost, born
well after the birth (and, arguably, death)
of rock and roll.
The Dead were heavily influenced by (and thus perhaps more closely
associated with) Pigpen's blues and Garcia's bluegrass, later diversified
to include Lesh's classical background and Mickey Hart's crosscultural
interests in percussion.
Phish probably draw on more musical
influences, if only because they started after more were recognized.
But they also draw on different ones: their roots are instead from
big band and neo-classical (Trey), bluegrass
and country (Mike), heavy metal (Fishman),
and 1980s "mall rock".
"Phish and the Grateful
Dead are not the same band. It must be said they were and remain
one of my favorite bands. In fact, the Dead are one of the most
important American bands, if not the most important. To me, the
Dead are a genuine link to traditional American music. They moved
music history forward. Jerry Garcia was as important a figure
in this country's music history as Bill Monroe or Elvis. Phish has learned a lot from them. They are an influence. But, that
said, we are also very different. The most important lesson we
learned from the Dead was how to be a live band."
-- Trey Anastasio, New York Post 1/1/99
This page last updated January 26, 2007. All contents © 1992-2007 Ellis Godard. All rights reserved.
|